-
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

Q&A with Sen. Tom Cotton
Q&A with Sen. Ron Wyden
Q&A with Rep. Louie Gohmert
Q&A with Rep. Ted Lieu
Q&A with Sen. Tim Scott

Categories

Adam Kinzinger
Adam Weigold
Affordable Care Act
Agenda 21
Ajit Pai
Al DeKruif
ALEC
Al-Qaeda
American Enterprise Institute
American Legislative Exchange Council
America's Future Foundation
Amy Koch
Andrea Kieffer
Andrea Mitchell
Androids
Ann Coulter
Apple
Arlen Specter
Arne Carlson
Atlas Shrugged
Bad Legislators
Bad Republicans
Barack Obama
Barbara Banian
Bashar al-Assad
Ben Ginsberg
Ben Golnik
Ben Wiener
Benghazi
Beth Cobert
Bill Jungbauer
Bill Paxon
Bill Pulkrabek
Bitcoin
Bloopers
Bob Barr
Bob Corker
Bob Davis
Bob Gunther
Bobby Joe Champion
Book Reviews
Branden Petersen
Brandon Petersen
Brandon Sawalich
Brian Johnson
Bron Scherer
Brookings Institution
Budget Control Act
Carla Nelson
Cass Sunstein
Cato Institute
Caucuses
CCHF
Chamber of Commerce
Charles Chaput
Charlie Rangel
China
Chip Cravaack
Chris McDaniel
Christine O'Donnell
Christopher Painter
Civil Forfeiture
Claire Robling
Climate Change
Common Cause
CREW
Cybersecurity
Cynthia Lummis
Dan Hall
Dan Severson
Dave Brat
Dave Senjem
David Fitzsimmons
David Sturrock
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Diane Johnson
Diane Rehm
Dick Armey
Donald Trump
DrudgeReport
Ed Morrissey
Education
Edward True
edX
Elijah Cummings
Erick Erickson
Erika Harold
Evie Axdahl
FBI
FCC
FEC
Federal Budget
Federal Communications Commission
Francesca Chambers
FreedomWorks
Gambling
Gay Marriage
General Electric
Geoff Michel
Global Warming
Good Legislators
Greg Davids
Growth & Opportunity
Growth and Opportunity Report
Haley Barbour
Harry Reid
Henry Barbour
Heritage Foundation
Hilda Solis
House Amendment 111
Iowa Caucus
Iowa Republican Party
Iran
IRS
ISIS
Jabhat al-Nusra
Jake Duesenberg
Janet Beihoffer
Jason Chaffetz
Jason Lewis
Jeff Bingaman
Jeff Flake
Jeff Johnson
Jeff Sessions
Jeh Johnson
Jim Abeler
Jim Oberstar
Jim Taylor
Joe Scarborough
John Blatnik
John Boehner
John Chafee
John Cornyn
John Gilmore
John Howe
John King
John Kline
John Kriesel
John McCain
John Nolte
John Yoo
Jonathan Merritt
Josh McKoon
Julianne Ortman
Julie Rosen
Justin Amash
Katrina Pierson
Keith Downey
Keith Ellison
Kelly Fenton
Keystone XL
King Banaian
KTLK
Kurt Bills
Kurt Daudt
Kurt Zellers
Labor Department
Laura Ingraham
Lee Goodman
Liberal Republicans
LightSquared
Linda Killian
LookTrueNorth
Loretta Lynch
Lost Generation
Louie Gohmert
Marco Rubio
Margaret Cavanagh
Marianne Stebbins
Mark Buesgens
Mark Dayton
Mark Foley
Mark Kennedy
Mark Meadows
Martin O'Malley
Marty Seifert
Mary Franson
Maryland
Matt Dean
Matthew Feeney
Media Bias
Mercatus Center
Michael Brodkorb
Michael Cummins
Michael Gerson
Michael Kubesh
Michael Mukasey
Michele Bachmann
Mike Benson
Mike O'Rielly
Mike Osskopp
Mike Parry
Mike Pompeo
Mike Sommers
Minimum Wage
Minnesota Budget
Minnesota Conservatives
Minnesota Legislature
Minnesota Republican Party
Minnesota Tea Party Alliance
Mitch Berg
Mitch McConnell
Mitch Pangerl
Mitt Romney
MNGOP
Modern States Education Alliance
MOOCs
Morrie Lanning
Nancy Pelosi
NARAL
National Security
Neal Peterson
Net Neutrality
New York Times
Newsbusters
Newt Gingrich
NFL
Norm Coleman
Norm Ornstein
NSA
ObamaCare
OccupyDC
Office of Fossil Energy
OPM
Orrin Hatch
Ottawa
Pat Anderson
Pat Buchanan
Pat Garofalo
Pat Shortridge
Paul Demko
Paul Gosar
Paul Koering
Paul Krugman
Paul Teller
Pete Hegseth
Pete Nelson
Pete Sessions
Peter King
Phil Krinkie
Pine City
Pine County
Pine County Republicans
Politics in Minnesota
President 2012
Privacy
Q&A
Racino
Rand Paul
Raul Labrador
Ravi Zacharias
Reason Magazine
Redistricting
Reince Priebus
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Renee Ellmers
Republican Liberty Caucus
Republican National Convention
Republican Party of Minnesota
Republican Study Committee
Rich Murray
Rick Nolan
Rick Perry
Rick Santorum
Rick Weible
Right to Work
RNC
Rod Hamilton
Rodney Davis
Roger Crawford
Ron Carey
Ron DeSantis
Ron Erhardt
Ron Latz
Ron Paul
Ron Wyden
Rory Koch
RSC
Rudy in the Media
Ryan Winkler
Ryan-Murray
Scott Dibble
Scott Honour
Sean Duffy
SEIU
Sharon Angle
Simply Right
Simpson-Bowles
Socialists
Solar Power
Solyndra
Stadium
Star Tribune
State of the GOP
Steny Hoyer
Steve Gottwalt
Steve Hensley
Steve Jobs
Steve Largent
Steve Perkins
Steve Scalise
Steve Smith
Steven Chu
Stingrays
Sue Jeffers
Syria
Tad Jude
TARP
Tarryl Clark
Tax Foundation
Taxes
Taxpayers' League of Minnesota
Tea Party
Ted Cruz
Ted Lieu
Ted Lovdahl
Terry McCall
Thad Cochran
Thomas Mann
Thomas Massie
Thomas Miller
Thomas Sowell
Tim Cook
Tim Faust
Tim Griffin
Tim Huelskamp
Tim Kelly
Tim Pawlenty
Tim Scott
Title II
Tobacco Taxes
Todd McIntyre
Tom Clougherty
Tom Coburn
Tom Cotton
Tom DeLay
Tom Emmer
Tom Graves
Tom Harkin
Tom McClintock
Tony Sutton
Trans-Alaskan Pipeline
Twila Brase
Unemployment
Unions
Vin Weber
Virginia Foxx
Walter Mondale
Warren Buffett
Wilfare
Will Hurd
William McBridge
Xi Jinping
Yvonne Prettner Solon
Zygi Wilf
powered by

Rudy Takala's Columns

The Roots of Deputy Chairman Michael Brodkorb’s Differences with National Committeewoman Pat Anderson

Newly-elected Republican National Committee (RNC) Woman Pat Anderson signed up over the last weekend to lobby for Canterbury Holdings “to promote racino, casino-style slot machines at the [Canterbury] track.” This has caused some controversy as the Republican Party’s base is divided on gambling. Click here for some coverage of the issue without commentary.
 
Deputy Minnesota GOP Chairman Michael Brodkorb came out immediately with some mudslinging, saying that Pat Anderson should resign her position with the Republican Party. “Ultimately she's going to have to choose,” he told the Star Tribune.
 
Interestingly enough, Mr. Brodkorb is also employed by the Minnesota Senate Republican Caucus. As Pat Anderson noted in a reply to his statement, Republican Senate President Michelle Fischbach -- "Michael's boss” -- is supporting a larger gambling proposal than racino. "Is he planning on kicking both of us out of the party?"
 
My understanding from talking to others is that state GOP chairman Tony Sutton does not support Brodkorb’s grandstanding on this issue. So it is interesting that he is engaging in this extracurricular activity.
 
I speak as someone who voted for Brodkorb for re-election at the most recent State Central. I did not vote for him in 2009 because I had impression of him that this incident is causing to become more reminiscent. He came across like a bully who at times acted unethically.
 
I am not going to comment much on Pat Anderson’s decision. Still, I would agree with the point she makes that it is inappropriate for our state to grant a monopoly to one group on the basis of race.
 
That said, what is noteworthy by virtue of its eccentricity is Mr. Brodkorb’s behavior. He and the Senate Republican group he represents often argue that it is inappropriate for conservatives to criticize wayward liberal Republicans because, they propose, it harms the party as a whole.
 
Would be it appropriate, according to Mr. Brodkorb’s view, to criticize the Senate Republicans for increasing state spending this year? Would it be appropriate to criticize Tim Pawlenty’s decision years ago to support a smoking ban in Minnesota bars? Would it be appropriate to criticize past legislation and future proposals by Mr. Brodkorb’s employers to build sports stadiums using other people’s money?
 
Mr. Brodkorb claims that it is not appropriate; he asserts that Republicans who support big government should be left alone. He made the claim, inappropriately asserting that it was a fact of the Republican Party, on the April 28 episode of Bob Davis’ KTLK program. (Click here to find it online.) He claimed it was the responsibility of Republican delegates to hold elected officials responsible.
 
Of course, Republican delegates in a legislator’s hometown are often a small group of people who rely heavily on their legislator to tell them what is going on. In many cases, their elected officials are not honest and do not tell their constituents the truth about what is going on.
 
Mr. Brodkorb mistakenly attempted to say that his employers should be left alone when they make bad decisions that promote the growth of government, and if no one notices, that is simply okay. No, it is not. We have a collective responsibility to make sure our elected officials do what they are supposed to do. If Mr. Brodkorb disagrees, he is in my view failing to perform the obligations of his office as deputy chairman.
 
That is part of the problem with Mr. Brodkorb’s decision to hold two positions. His role as an employee for the more liberal wing of the Republican Party’s leadership is in conflict with his ideal role as a conservative watchdog as the Minnesota Republican Party’s Deputy Chairman. So in part, I would surmise that Mr. Brodkorb’s actions are a consequence of that conflict of interest. 
 
Yet a second observation that I have, and one which I believe plays a much more fundamental role in understanding Mr. Brodkorb, is that there is no rhyme or reason behind Mr. Brodkorb’s attacks or kvetching. I believe it is simply the manifestation of several personality flaws that I mistakenly, and regrettably, believed Mr. Brodkorb had begun to suppress over the years since he was first elected. Mr. Brodkorb’s actions are strictly a product of his personality, not of conviction or his position as deputy chair. Here’s why.
 
Number one: Attacking – or what some might even describe as bullying – Pat Anderson is not a requisite of Mr. Brodkorb’s position. If it were a requisite, Tony Sutton would be dutifully supplementing Mr. Brodkorb’s assertions with statements of his own. Additionally, the Republican State Executive Committee would probably censure Pat Anderson. (That will not happen, because a majority of its members support her and, frankly, would support silently if not publicly breaking up the Indian monopoly on gambling.)
 
Number two: Neither of those two things is happening. Does it benefit Mr. Brodkorb to attack Ms. Anderson? Again, the answer is no. If there were a solid rationale behind his actions, we would probably see other noteworthy Republicans joining in his crusade.
 
Number three: Not only does Mr. Brodkorb’s boss, Senate President Fischbach, support racino, so does Republican Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers. So do twelve Republican committee chairs in the legislature. Mr. Brodkorb is not attacking them; he has ludicrously and almost bizarrely singled out Pat Anderson.
 
It seems clear that Mr. Brodkorb is not acting rationally. What is his motive? I would expect that it is simply the product of an inability on his part to work with the more conservative wing of the party. Mr. Brodkorb is quite literally paid by the Senate GOP to defend the liberal, elitist, “establishment” wing of the party. That conflict of interest has become a sideshow to the issues that matter, and it is causing Mr. Brodkorb to act in a manner that damages the Republican Party.
 
When I voted for Mr. Brodkorb in April, I did not anticipate that he would parade around his employers’ opinions so extravagantly. (This is not to say his employers necessarily dislike Pat Anderson. It is to say that while Ms. Anderson is able to work with Mr. Brodkorb’s employers, Mr. Brodkorb is not as easily able to work with someone with whom he disagrees.)
 
Secondly, I did not anticipate that Mr. Brodkorb would return to acting with the same crankiness or eccentricity that accompanied his personal style for a predominance of his career.
 
I believe it is safe to say that not much will come of this difference between Ms. Anderson and Mr. Brodkorb. Ms. Anderson has a supportive and loyal base; Mr. Brodkorb is not noticeable enough to warrant much attention. Yet the incident has been one of the rare illuminations into a usually quieter divide in the Republican Party.
 
As for Mr. Brodkorb, it should be observed that people who live in glass houses should not throw stones. He is a liberal Republican who has been helpful to the party in some respects. Conservatives may tolerate that. Yet if he calls on generally reliable conservatives to resign their positions in the party, he should first reflect on how he might respond to a reciprocal call.
 

5 Comments to The Roots of Deputy Chairman Michael Brodkorb’s Differences with National Committeewoman Pat Anderson:

Comments RSS
VastRightWingConspiracy on Sunday, May 01, 2011 11:04 PM
I have had the same experience with Mr. Brodkorb that you speak of. However, I don't think you can gloss over Tony Sutton's role in all of this. Tony is on the board of CAGE which has received significant funding from the casino cartel through the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association and its lobbyists, including Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen (which represents the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe). Coincidentally, although not a member of CAGE, former GOP Chairman Chris Georgacas is also a lobbyist for the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. Tony Sutton was featured in a recent Star Tribune article where the reporter asked him whether he worked as a paid consultant for CAGE. Sutton refused to divulge his client list. Interestingly, he did not deny being a paid consultant for CAGE. What's worse is that the casino cartel has been one of the biggest contributors to the DFL party (including the start party, House DFL and Senate DFL caucuses). In the last election alone, the tribes gave over $1 million to the DFL party, the House DFL caucus and the Senate DFL caucus. They gave about $5000 to Republicans. The real question is why would our party chair and party operatives like Georgacas and Jack and Annette Meeks be agents for entities which give millions to the DFL?
Reply to comment


VastRightWingConspiracy on Sunday, May 01, 2011 11:04 PM
I have had the same experience with Mr. Brodkorb that you speak of. However, I don't think you can gloss over Tony Sutton's role in all of this. Tony is on the board of CAGE which has received significant funding from the casino cartel through the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association and its lobbyists, including Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen (which represents the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe). Coincidentally, although not a member of CAGE, former GOP Chairman Chris Georgacas is also a lobbyist for the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. Tony Sutton was featured in a recent Star Tribune article where the reporter asked him whether he worked as a paid consultant for CAGE. Sutton refused to divulge his client list. Interestingly, he did not deny being a paid consultant for CAGE. What's worse is that the casino cartel has been one of the biggest contributors to the DFL party (including the start party, House DFL and Senate DFL caucuses). In the last election alone, the tribes gave over $1 million to the DFL party, the House DFL caucus and the Senate DFL caucus. They gave about $5000 to Republicans. The real question is why would our party chair and party operatives like Georgacas and Jack and Annette Meeks be agents for entities which give millions to the DFL?
Reply to comment


VastRightWingConspiracy on Sunday, May 01, 2011 11:05 PM
I have had the same experience with Mr. Brodkorb that you speak of. However, I don't think you can gloss over Tony Sutton's role in all of this. Tony is on the board of CAGE which has received significant funding from the casino cartel through the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association and its lobbyists, including Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen (which represents the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe). Coincidentally, although not a member of CAGE, former GOP Chairman Chris Georgacas is also a lobbyist for the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. Tony Sutton was featured in a recent Star Tribune article where the reporter asked him whether he worked as a paid consultant for CAGE. Sutton refused to divulge his client list. Interestingly, he did not deny being a paid consultant for CAGE. What's worse is that the casino cartel has been one of the biggest contributors to the DFL party (including the start party, House DFL and Senate DFL caucuses). In the last election alone, the tribes gave over $1 million to the DFL party, the House DFL caucus and the Senate DFL caucus. They gave about $5000 to Republicans. The real question is why would our party chair and party operatives like Georgacas and Jack and Annette Meeks be agents for entities which give millions to the DFL?
Reply to comment


VastRightWingConspiracy on Sunday, May 01, 2011 11:05 PM
I have had the same experience with Mr. Brodkorb that you speak of. However, I don't think you can gloss over Tony Sutton's role in all of this. Tony is on the board of CAGE which has received significant funding from the casino cartel through the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association and its lobbyists, including Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen (which represents the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe). Coincidentally, although not a member of CAGE, former GOP Chairman Chris Georgacas is also a lobbyist for the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. Tony Sutton was featured in a recent Star Tribune article where the reporter asked him whether he worked as a paid consultant for CAGE. Sutton refused to divulge his client list. Interestingly, he did not deny being a paid consultant for CAGE. What's worse is that the casino cartel has been one of the biggest contributors to the DFL party (including the start party, House DFL and Senate DFL caucuses). In the last election alone, the tribes gave over $1 million to the DFL party, the House DFL caucus and the Senate DFL caucus. They gave about $5000 to Republicans. The real question is why would our party chair and party operatives like Georgacas and Jack and Annette Meeks be agents for entities which give millions to the DFL?
Reply to comment


VastRightWingConspiracy on Sunday, May 01, 2011 11:05 PM
I have had the same experience with Mr. Brodkorb that you speak of. However, I don't think you can gloss over Tony Sutton's role in all of this. Tony is on the board of CAGE which has received significant funding from the casino cartel through the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association and its lobbyists, including Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen (which represents the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe). Coincidentally, although not a member of CAGE, former GOP Chairman Chris Georgacas is also a lobbyist for the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. Tony Sutton was featured in a recent Star Tribune article where the reporter asked him whether he worked as a paid consultant for CAGE. Sutton refused to divulge his client list. Interestingly, he did not deny being a paid consultant for CAGE. What's worse is that the casino cartel has been one of the biggest contributors to the DFL party (including the start party, House DFL and Senate DFL caucuses). In the last election alone, the tribes gave over $1 million to the DFL party, the House DFL caucus and the Senate DFL caucus. They gave about $5000 to Republicans. The real question is why would our party chair and party operatives like Georgacas and Jack and Annette Meeks be agents for entities which give millions to the DFL?
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment
Website Builder provided by  Vistaprint