-
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

Q&A with Sen. Tom Cotton
Q&A with Sen. Ron Wyden
Q&A with Rep. Louie Gohmert
Q&A with Rep. Ted Lieu
Q&A with Sen. Tim Scott

Categories

Adam Kinzinger
Adam Weigold
Affordable Care Act
Agenda 21
Ajit Pai
Al DeKruif
ALEC
Al-Qaeda
American Enterprise Institute
American Legislative Exchange Council
America's Future Foundation
Amy Koch
Andrea Kieffer
Andrea Mitchell
Androids
Ann Coulter
Apple
Arlen Specter
Arne Carlson
Atlas Shrugged
Bad Legislators
Bad Republicans
Barack Obama
Barbara Banian
Bashar al-Assad
Ben Ginsberg
Ben Golnik
Ben Wiener
Benghazi
Beth Cobert
Bill Jungbauer
Bill Paxon
Bill Pulkrabek
Bitcoin
Bloopers
Bob Barr
Bob Corker
Bob Davis
Bob Gunther
Bobby Joe Champion
Book Reviews
Branden Petersen
Brandon Petersen
Brandon Sawalich
Brian Johnson
Bron Scherer
Brookings Institution
Budget Control Act
Carla Nelson
Cass Sunstein
Cato Institute
Caucuses
CCHF
Chamber of Commerce
Charles Chaput
Charlie Rangel
China
Chip Cravaack
Chris McDaniel
Christine O'Donnell
Christopher Painter
Civil Forfeiture
Claire Robling
Climate Change
Common Cause
CREW
Cybersecurity
Cynthia Lummis
Dan Hall
Dan Severson
Dave Brat
Dave Senjem
David Fitzsimmons
David Sturrock
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Diane Johnson
Diane Rehm
Dick Armey
Donald Trump
DrudgeReport
Ed Morrissey
Education
Edward True
edX
Elijah Cummings
Erick Erickson
Erika Harold
Evie Axdahl
FBI
FCC
FEC
Federal Budget
Federal Communications Commission
Francesca Chambers
FreedomWorks
Gambling
Gay Marriage
General Electric
Geoff Michel
Global Warming
Good Legislators
Greg Davids
Growth & Opportunity
Growth and Opportunity Report
Haley Barbour
Harry Reid
Henry Barbour
Heritage Foundation
Hilda Solis
House Amendment 111
Iowa Caucus
Iowa Republican Party
Iran
IRS
ISIS
Jabhat al-Nusra
Jake Duesenberg
Janet Beihoffer
Jason Chaffetz
Jason Lewis
Jeff Bingaman
Jeff Flake
Jeff Johnson
Jeff Sessions
Jeh Johnson
Jim Abeler
Jim Oberstar
Jim Taylor
Joe Scarborough
John Blatnik
John Boehner
John Chafee
John Cornyn
John Gilmore
John Howe
John King
John Kline
John Kriesel
John McCain
John Nolte
John Yoo
Jonathan Merritt
Josh McKoon
Julianne Ortman
Julie Rosen
Justin Amash
Katrina Pierson
Keith Downey
Keith Ellison
Kelly Fenton
Keystone XL
King Banaian
KTLK
Kurt Bills
Kurt Daudt
Kurt Zellers
Labor Department
Laura Ingraham
Lee Goodman
Liberal Republicans
LightSquared
Linda Killian
LookTrueNorth
Loretta Lynch
Lost Generation
Louie Gohmert
Marco Rubio
Margaret Cavanagh
Marianne Stebbins
Mark Buesgens
Mark Dayton
Mark Foley
Mark Kennedy
Mark Meadows
Martin O'Malley
Marty Seifert
Mary Franson
Maryland
Matt Dean
Matthew Feeney
Media Bias
Mercatus Center
Michael Brodkorb
Michael Cummins
Michael Gerson
Michael Kubesh
Michael Mukasey
Michele Bachmann
Mike Benson
Mike O'Rielly
Mike Osskopp
Mike Parry
Mike Pompeo
Mike Sommers
Minimum Wage
Minnesota Budget
Minnesota Conservatives
Minnesota Legislature
Minnesota Republican Party
Minnesota Tea Party Alliance
Mitch Berg
Mitch McConnell
Mitch Pangerl
Mitt Romney
MNGOP
Modern States Education Alliance
MOOCs
Morrie Lanning
Nancy Pelosi
NARAL
National Security
Neal Peterson
Net Neutrality
New York Times
Newsbusters
Newt Gingrich
NFL
Norm Coleman
Norm Ornstein
NSA
ObamaCare
OccupyDC
Office of Fossil Energy
OPM
Orrin Hatch
Ottawa
Pat Anderson
Pat Buchanan
Pat Garofalo
Pat Shortridge
Paul Demko
Paul Gosar
Paul Koering
Paul Krugman
Paul Teller
Pete Hegseth
Pete Nelson
Pete Sessions
Peter King
Phil Krinkie
Pine City
Pine County
Pine County Republicans
Politics in Minnesota
President 2012
Privacy
Q&A
Racino
Rand Paul
Raul Labrador
Ravi Zacharias
Reason Magazine
Redistricting
Reince Priebus
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Renee Ellmers
Republican Liberty Caucus
Republican National Convention
Republican Party of Minnesota
Republican Study Committee
Rich Murray
Rick Nolan
Rick Perry
Rick Santorum
Rick Weible
Right to Work
RNC
Rod Hamilton
Rodney Davis
Roger Crawford
Ron Carey
Ron DeSantis
Ron Erhardt
Ron Latz
Ron Paul
Ron Wyden
Rory Koch
RSC
Rudy in the Media
Ryan Winkler
Ryan-Murray
Scott Dibble
Scott Honour
Sean Duffy
SEIU
Sharon Angle
Simply Right
Simpson-Bowles
Socialists
Solar Power
Solyndra
Stadium
Star Tribune
State of the GOP
Steny Hoyer
Steve Gottwalt
Steve Hensley
Steve Jobs
Steve Largent
Steve Perkins
Steve Scalise
Steve Smith
Steven Chu
Stingrays
Sue Jeffers
Syria
Tad Jude
TARP
Tarryl Clark
Tax Foundation
Taxes
Taxpayers' League of Minnesota
Tea Party
Ted Cruz
Ted Lieu
Ted Lovdahl
Terry McCall
Thad Cochran
Thomas Mann
Thomas Massie
Thomas Miller
Thomas Sowell
Tim Cook
Tim Faust
Tim Griffin
Tim Huelskamp
Tim Kelly
Tim Pawlenty
Tim Scott
Title II
Tobacco Taxes
Todd McIntyre
Tom Clougherty
Tom Coburn
Tom Cotton
Tom DeLay
Tom Emmer
Tom Graves
Tom Harkin
Tom McClintock
Tony Sutton
Trans-Alaskan Pipeline
Twila Brase
Unemployment
Unions
Vin Weber
Virginia Foxx
Walter Mondale
Warren Buffett
Wilfare
Will Hurd
William McBridge
Xi Jinping
Yvonne Prettner Solon
Zygi Wilf
powered by

Rudy Takala's Columns

Political Speech Under Attack

I authored this opinion piece for the  Minnesota Tea Party Magazine.  It is available only here and in the print edition of the magazine:

(MN Tea Party Alliance) -- In the announcement that he would seek to take executive action on immigration, President Obama declared that he was drawing his authority, in part, from Americans who had chosen not to vote. “To everyone who voted, I want you to know that I hear you. To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process… I hear you, too.”
 
To some, that may come across as simple conceit. However, it is more significant. It is part of a broader intellectual framework being developed by Washingtonians seeking to defy democracy and casually disregard constitutional restrictions on federal power. It represents a set of ideas that seek to undermine traditional separation of powers. Those ideas are going to gain momentum if they are not met with a response.
 
The Washington class believes there are two “problems” with American government. One is Congress. Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution and Norm Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute are two of the most prolific advocates of the view that Congress is not working properly. Specifically, they claim that Congress does not approve President Obama’s agenda often enough. Therefore, it is broken. Writing in 2012, they said that Republicans were too protestant of the president’s agenda:
 
An examination of the Obama presidency suggests that we are experiencing neither politics as usual nor an odd blip. We are witnessing unprecedented and unbalanced polarization of the parties, with Republicans acting like a parliamentary minority party opposing almost everything put forward by the Democrats.
 
“We’ve all heard the laments... that Washington is broken, that our political system can’t grapple with the nation’s big, long-term problems,” they wrote. To be sure, that view is prevalent in the Washington echo chamber. We often hear Congress maligned as “dysfunctional” when it refuses to pass the president’s legislation. From the perspective of Washington academics, our constitutional system is “broken” when it does not result in the policy outcomes they prefer.
 
We are told the second problem is too many Americans failing to vote properly. It does not matter whether they show up. When they stay home, their consent for an all-powerful executive branch is assumed. When they show up and vote against the president, we are told that they were given bad information.
 
A popular term for describing this “problem” emerging within academia is “fragmentation.” It is the idea that voters seek viewpoints that agree with their own. According to the technocrats, voters are usually wrong, and thus seek out the wrong opinions.
 
President Obama’s former regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, wrote a book called Republic 2.0 in which he described his views on the Internet. “A system of limitless options, may lead in unfortunate directions, both for… individuals and for society at large,” Sunstein wrote. One potential solution he proposed was forcing Websites to display content with which they did not agree.
 
However, we are also told that those who agree with the president are not the problem. It is those who disagree who simply do not have enough information. Journalist Farhad Manjoo, writing in his book True Enough, reiterates a study conducted by Stanford Communications Chair Shanto Iyengar:
 
[Iyengar] discovered that Republicans were far friendlier to Fox than were Democrats to either CNN or NPR; Republicans showed, in other words, a much greater propensity toward giving in to their bias.
 
To condense the second problem, it is that the limitless options of our present age in fact mean fewer options. Because of the abundance of information available, Americans are actually becoming less informed. The solution is to force them to look at the “right” information, and perhaps to block them from viewing the “wrong” information. This only applies to those who do not support the president. Those who support him already have the correct information.
 
If we evolve the Washingtonian argument a bit, we can summarize it as such: The Constitution represents a broken system in which there are unnecessary checks and balances. The only way for the government to do everything it should is for the executive branch to do so without input from Congress and to disregard any constitutional restrictions that are too burdensome. If you are not on board with this agenda, you have fallen victim to bad information and need to be given the right information.
 
President Obama’s expression of this emerging philosophy was brief. Yet it was not coincidental or meaningless. It represents a significant body of thought germinating among many in the ruling Washington class. Americans need to recognize these ideas and respond with the force merited by their implications.

0 Comments to Political Speech Under Attack:

Comments RSS

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment
Website Builder provided by  Vistaprint